When you prompt an AI, you're accessing a compression of all human knowledge, creativity and expression. A conversation with the collective conscious, made interactive and articulate. Every conversation we have with AI draws on patterns from millions of minds, billions of feelings and thoughts, centuries of human expression.
It is not yet a full repository of all we've ever done as a species on Earth, but that is the horizon towards which we are heading.
This is Panthropism: a direct dialogue with the distilled essence of our civilisation. We're communing with the whole of human life and accomplishment. And from that communion, something remarkable follows: eight billion creative pulses, each finding a voice for the first time.
I nearly always begin my talks by saying this: whilst I think there is much to embrace and be optimistic about in how AI and human creativity intersect, there are also many things we can legitimately, more widely, fear and be cautious about with AI. The optimism in my work is earned through evidence, not assumed through convenience. These broader cautions deserve to be stated plainly.
Throughout two books, many columns for The Bookseller and articles elsewhere, a set of interconnected concepts has taken shape. Each is a product of my thinking and experience, tested in public speaking, written interaction and dialogue with humans and machines. Together, they form the key elements of the choreography for the dance between humans and machines.
The Panthropic was introduced in Quiver, don't Quake (Mensch Publishing, 2025), named Story of the Year by The New Publishing Standard. Since then, it has been developed through a monthly column for The Bookseller, international talks, and a growing conversation with thinkers, critics and practitioners across the creative industries.
These are some of the places where the idea has been explored, extended and challenged.
To champion a new way of seeing the world without first listening, truly listening, to those who view it with suspicion would be an act of arrogance. The Panthropic has drawn serious critique from serious people. They deserve engagement, not dismissal.
Nathan's challenge is fair and searching. The Panthropic does encompass humanity's worst alongside its best. That's precisely why intention matters: why I advocate for Calibrated Trust, for ethical training data, for the active inclusion of compassion, empathy, peacefulness and justice in what AI learns. The Panthropic is a mirror of civilisation. We have an active role in making that mirror truthful and humane.
Emily Bender's "stochastic parrot" argument challenges whether AI understands anything at all, or merely mimics patterns. Gary Marcus points to brittleness beneath the fluency. Nick Cave calls AI-generated art "a grotesque mockery" born without the suffering that gives human creativity its weight. Timnit Gebru warns of data colonialism: whose voices are included, whose are erased. Jaron Lanier frames the whole enterprise as high-tech plagiarism detached from compensation.
These are constructive contradictions, not obstacles. They are guardrails. The answer to Bender's grounding problem: in partnership with humans who do have lived grounding, AI becomes a tool for exploring and articulating human experience. The answer to Cave's absence of suffering: precisely right, and precisely why human creativity remains essential. The AI amplifies human soul; it doesn't replace it. The answer to Gebru's data colonialism: this is why the Panthropic must be universally available, trained ethically, and built with equity at its core, by being fully inclusive of literature and all other works from what are sometimes called 'low resource languages'. They bring new language, new narratives, values and perspectives, relative to the initial Anglocentric nature of AI.
The dance continues. We know where the floor is slippery.
The Panthropic emerged from two books that chart the relationship between human creativity and artificial intelligence: the first through publishing's lens, the second across all creative endeavour.
The Panthropic is a developing idea. Each month, through my Substack, I extend the framework, engage with new research, and explore what happens when humans converse with the distilled essence of their own civilisation.
Subscribe on Substack